Pokémon Forever

More Pokemon Names

Posted on 13 Feb 2005

I’ve updated PokeFor’s new Pokemon list with the names Usohachi, Manene, and Manyula.


I haven’t yet tried recovering the full update.

Comments

Comments for: More Pokemon Names

There are 72 comments. Further commenting has been closed.

By Emperor ServingSpoon on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 8:36 AM

If Sudowoodo were to evolve and gain part fighting type, I might reconsider using him. The other names however, I have no idea about so can hardly draw any theories out of.

By jaass on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 8:41 AM

i am sorry but i still need more proof because joe will not believe you without prooof or any other infomation.

By Emperor ServingSpoon on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 8:59 AM

What’s there to prove? They’re just names… What’s the big problem if you believe the names and they change? It’s not like he’s posting the entire information for a Pokemon or something…

On a slightly more important note, I noticed in the Archives section that the updates from January 2005, are under January 2004. It’s still after December 2004 and before February 2005, just it seems to be mislabeled.

By PurpleKecleon on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 9:02 AM

Who cares about if Joe believes him or not? He’ll only believe once he can post it on his site saying “YOU SAW IT HERE FIRST” with ‘verified’ information so that he won’t be wrong to be held accountable.

Now, I really can’t wait for visuals, I want to be able to draw these Pokemon > < ugh, it’s so annoying how we always know of the names way in advance and the months seem to take forever before we finally get to SEE THE POKEMON O_O not to mention all of the new ones we won’t even see ‘til the games come out. --;

By Animelee on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 9:03 AM

Who cares if he believes him or not?

Anyways, other than Usohachi, I can’t draw any guesses from the other names. Manyula has me thinking of a [much-needed] evolution for Monjala/Tangela, but it’s a stretch.

Manene draws a total shrug, heh.

By Water Pokémon Master on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 10:07 AM

Thank you Meowth for the info! You must have good inside sources, since you always have the names a few months in advance.

Sudowoodo evolving? I can’t really imagine it. Tangela too. o_O

By Jean on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 10:22 AM

Wow… an evolved form of Sudowoodo would be really interesting. Or an un-evolved form, but it probably wouldn’t be that. Though, you never know.

I would liek to know why they tease us with names, and then finally release what the Pokemon look like months later.. or just SILHOUETTES. @_@

By Arty2 on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 10:46 AM

Well, since no one can prove that they don’t exist, this is valid pre-release info. Nice discovery Meowth.

On a sidenote, a “remember me” function would be really nice for the comments :)

By PurpleKecleon on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 10:46 AM

Manyula sort of reminded me of nyula.. but I’m doubting a relation o.o; manene is fun to say over and over again…

By Animelee on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 10:54 AM

Good point, PK. Manyula could be an evolution of Neula/Nyula (however one chooses to romanize it…), a.k.a. Sneasel.

By Meowth346 on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 10:59 AM

Did I fail to mention that Manene and Manyula were applied for trademark one after the other, meaning there’s a chance that they’re related, but that doesn’t mean that they for sure are?

By Animelee on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 11:02 AM

Pssh, why didn’t I see it earlier? Manene and Manyula are such similar names, they could either be an entirely NEW species family of Pokémon, or “twin” Pokémon like Plusle-Minun and Volbeat-Illumise.

By Porygon on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 11:06 AM

Poor Tangela and Sneasal, they really need evolutions, and it looks like they may have just barely missed their last chance. ^_^

By Water Pokémon Master on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 11:13 AM

Hey, there could be a 5th generation! ^_^;

By Animelee on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 11:20 AM

Pokémon will go on for a LONG time – Satoshi Tajiri is barely 40-years-old, and Junichi Masuda is probably only thirty-something. Plus when you have a franchise like Pokémon, why stop rakin’ in the dough? :D It’s like if Coke announced they were going to stop producing their products, hehe.

That was just pure speculation on my part! ^^ Well, you never know, they could be getting evolutions, we’ve only heard of five DS Generation Pokémon so far, and I’m guessing they’ll at least break the 500 mark for Diamond and Pearl, and I’m sure a few of the new Pokémon will be either evolutions or pre-evolutions (> _<) of the first 386. :)

By Gaiash Ketoji on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 12:43 PM

Pokemon will continue until every one of Satoshis Pokemon he designed have appeared in the games, anime and manga. So far we have 386 Pokemon plus Rukario and Munchlax, thats 388 out of over 1000.

By Anonymous on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 2:22 PM

Meowth, it’s not that I don’t trust you, but I remember back around the time RS first came out in Japan, you mentioned the name “Erupiiya” (or was it “Erupiyaa”?), and no Pokémon by that name ever came into existance.

And, Gaiash Ketoji, I’ve learned to take that bit about Tajiri-san having already created 1000 Pokémon with a grain of salt.

By Kojiro on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 2:24 PM

Um,Meowth, could I ask where you got this info from? Not to be mean!

By Kojiro on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 2:24 PM

Um,Meowth, could I ask where you got this info from? Not to be mean!

By AtoMan on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 3:44 PM

RUKARIO ‘ru ca ri o, reversed to o ri ca ru, sounds like “oracle”’ - so it’s English name could be Elcaro or sth ;-) I think it looks little Haruka’ish. Usohachi - evolution of Usokki? It’d be cool.

By DoctorOak on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 3:49 PM

They’re from trademarks filed at the Japanese Trademark and Patent office I believe.

A lot of Pokemon from the third Generation were revealed this way and their trademarking can (but not always) mean that they’ll be getting shown off at some point in the not too far and distant future (At the least, i suspect they’ll be at Festa this summer).

They’re pretty reliable. Not infallible but the best we have until the Pokemon are officially revealed.

Though, you do have to hold some reservation. That Euripiya thing could be an indication of assumptions gone wrong. Then again, maybe it’s a Pokemon that got dropped at the last moment after filing a trademark for it? Ho-oh, after all, was going to be in Red and Green before it was dropped. That’s why there was a Ho-oh of sorts ready to cameo in the first ep of the anime.

By Anonymous on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 4:18 PM

Less than half the names found this way in 2002 actually bore fruit and became Pokemon though

Dont count them just yet

By Zhen Lin on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 4:45 PM

Searching for trademarks filed under Nintendo/GameFreak/Creatures, you can find:

Pokemon Topaz

Pokemon Amethyst

Pokemon White Gold

None of which have ever actually materialised. Also of note is that Pokemon Water Blue is submitted by the same “person” as Gonbe…

By Animelee on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 4:50 PM

They’re probably just placeholders for potential names of games. Or maybe they have money to waste? Or maybe…

ERUPIYAA sounds like it could be Erupiyer, or Erupyer, or something like that. It could’ve been Bakuda’s (Camerupt) first name.

Remember, for a few examples, Airmed (Skarmory) was once going to be Yoroidori, and Harisen (Qwilfish) was going to be Buku.

By Unown Lord on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 5:12 PM

There is nothing to doubt–the source for these names is the list of official trademarks by Gamefreak. Meowth keeps track of that list and has learned how to get past the special procedures taken by the company to ensure that no one finds out what they have in store earlier than desired. This does not only include names of upcoming Pokemon, but also the games themselves.

Everything surrounding the trademarks is up to the chosen path of advertising by the company. For instance, the trademark for “Pokemon Diamond and Pearl” was apparently registered upon the announcement of the games. In contrast, the trademark for “Pokemon Fire Red and Leaf Green” had been concealed some time before the respective announcement. It would be accurate to infer that the factors involved are what the company has in plan for the trademark in question (using the above example, Pokemon Dash, Diamond and Pearl were all announced as part of the Nintendo DS campaign), as well as the extent to which the name of the trademark could shed light on its actual content (“Pokemon Fire Red and Leaf Green” quite clearly signifies remade versions of the original games, whereas “Pokemon Diamond and Pearl” delivers little to nothing at this stage).

I have just heard of “Manene” and “Manyula”, but as mentioned “Usohachi” has been a registered trademark for some time now. In fact, it was registered alongside “Gonbe”, or at least closely next to it. “Rukario” was registered on October 28th, 2004, and only now the time of its announcement has come. Although it is not guaranteed, these three probable candidates for new Pokemon should be announced in the near future. I can only expect them to fill the same role as Munchlax did last year in the seventh movie–although there was no Pikachu Short, the appearance of Munchlax in the movie constituted the same idea. In the upcoming movie, Munchlax will star next to Pikachu as what appears to me the secondary mascot (Plusle and Minun filled that role in the seventh movie, but Munchlax seems to be serving it permanently from now on), and so the role of new Pokemon whose appearance in the movie constitutes as the Pikachu Short is only to be expected. These could be those Pokemon (Rukario, on the other hand, is undoubtedly a main character in the movie, comparable to Lugia and Latias/Latios).

I would suggest that fans keep any further speculation to the minimum. What we should know is that it is highly probable that these are new Pokemon to be introduced in the upcoming movie, and more importantly the next installment of games. I find that speculative assumptions based on the mere names could lead to more headache rather than anything worthwhile.

By Jeff on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 6:17 PM

Has anyone thought that Usohachi could be a Sudowoodo prevo (sorry if anyone already brought that up…) It makes sense to me, since they already made one for Snorlax. If that’s the case, Munchlax and this guy would probably be right next to each other on the pokedex or something like that.

By Anonymous on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 8:30 PM

So if Meowth is able to bypass security measures unown lord, (my next comment isn’t intended to be offensive to meowth but is to clarify what unown lord said.), wouldn’t that be illegal? I find myself doubting your claim at lest.

By DoctorOak on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 8:40 PM

It’s not illegal in any means. Trademarks and Patents are globally open for public viewing.

By Anonymous on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 8:44 PM

I meant if security had been set up to stop people veiwing them. I dont know too much about laws as I’m only 12 but that seems like a given.

By Serebii on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 8:50 PM

Your info is fake > _> Please don’t go spreading rumors. Thank you

By Unown Lord on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 9:10 PM

I apologize if I created the wrong impression. As said, trademarks and patents are accessible for anyone to view. By “getting past the special procedures taken by the company” I meant that Meowth has come to learn how the company conceals many of its registered trademarks. The trademarks are generally registered under a person’s name (I believe that a fabricated company name was the technique used in the case of Fire Red/Leaf Green), and only after some form of official announcement is the trademark no longer concealed, being under the name of Nintendo/Creatures/Game Freak.

Further queries on the subject will have to be addressed to Meowth, as I only happen to know any of this thanks to him. I merely felt that it was necessary to point this out to those who were unaware of this, and instead chose to believe that Meowth had a hidden source whose reliability should be questioned. If any of these trademarks does not turn out to be an actual Pokemon, Meowth will not be the one to blame for the misinformation, but rather the company for registering an unused trademark. Of course, that is a bridge that we will very likely not have to cross.

By Anonymous on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 9:13 PM

oh sorry. i was confused there.

By Typhlosion on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 9:14 PM

I know this sounds crazy, but those names - Pokémon Topaz, Amethyst, White Gold, and Water Blue - could be dummy names to throw off people like Meowth346 who are keeping an eye on the trademarks.

By Doctor Oak on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 9:21 PM

More likely they’re registered to stop problems like the original Diamond and Jade happening again. Pokemon Diamond wasn’t trademarked until after the problem and gave the pirates a legal loophole in that respect.

I believe they got screwed by the Pokemon trademark itself though.

By Kingyo on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 9:37 PM

Serebii, how can you be so sure about that? Got a friend in GameFreak or so?

If not, I don’t think anyone can say, that it’s true, OR false. We’ll just have wait and see..

By jass on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 9:59 PM

I have to agree with Serebii/Joe > _<

By Meowth346 on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 10:00 PM

“Erupiyaa” was an incorrect name someone I thought was reliable gave it. It wasn’t a real name. Usohachi, etc., however, are names that have been registered for Pokemon, and there were a few registered names for Ruby/Sapphire’s time that either didn’t get used or changed a little.

By Meowth346 on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 10:07 PM

As a note, I don’t know if this Serebii posting here is the same as Serebii from serebii.net. “Serebii” is simpll a Pokemon’s (Japanese) name, so anyone could be using it.

By gibby on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 10:37 PM

don’t they have shadow’s of them like they did with rukario

By Serebii on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 10:40 PM

Yes, this is me alright you bloody pricks. Do you have any proof to back your information up? Where did you get the names from?

Until you show proof, this is considered fake.

By Meowth346 on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 10:54 PM

Proof will come in the future. Until then, those who are skeptic can ignore this. Those who know that I’ve presented this kind of data early on, they’ll be able to expect these Pokemon in the future. And any web site who thinks information can’t be accurate unless they’re the one that confirms it, well, they can ignore this, too.

By TeddiUrsa on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 11:22 PM

Is it me or does serebii attack sites every time they seem to have news earlier very often ? -.-

I think he is taking this stuff too gosh serious..-.-

I think there is a chance that these names are names for new pokemon, it isn t clearly confirmed, but nobody said so..

By DoctorOak on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 11:48 PM

I’m not the biggest fan of Serebii or his methods but i’d say that last ‘post’ is not his. He wouldn’t normally resort to such a stupidly low level.

As i’ve said before, what’s the harm in taking these names to be valid and then if they don’t show up as Pokemon, simply discarding them and saying “looks like they arn’t using the Trademarks”. It makes a lot more sense to me than blasting them and then if they do show up ending up stuck in a position of “Well… Um… Oh Dear, I was wrong.”

They’re just names. The fan-community is looking for news on the new games and we’d all graciously take anything we can get. Whether or not these names arn’t used doesn’t really matter. There’s no proof to say they wont be just as there’s little to say they will.

The Pokemon Fan Community gets an unfairly bad reputation because people run around taking stuff like this so seriously they scream, shout and yell about something so small. If the members of the community grew up and acted maturely we might be able to actually have a strong, proper community rather than the weak, bickering “I had it first” one we have now.

By Unown Lord on Feb. 13th, 2005 at 11:55 PM

If you actually need to ask what the source of these names is, you are deliberately making yourself look ignorant. I have already explicitly noted that these are registered trademarks, and tried to shed light as to how Meowth stumbled upon them. I have taken the liberty to ask Meowth to provide the actual listing for these trademarks, including the date of registeration. The following is the listing:

[Meowth346’s Edit: There’s a problem with Japanese in the comments =( I’ve removed that part of the post, but I’ll upload something about these later on, or you can repost it without the Japanese.]

As you can see, Lucario is the most recent one, while Gonbe dates back to last year’s January. Usohachi was registered in June (as opposed to my previous statement that it was registered almost alongside Gonbe). As for Manene and Manyula, the two were registered on the same date in August, further implying that they are connected to one another.

Again, there is no guarantee that these will truly become Pokemon, and that if they do, they will necessarily retain these names–but this would appear to be the current plan. It is the very least one could claim that lies behind these trademarks, which were officially registered by the company.

By Serebii on Feb. 14th, 2005 at 12:24 AM

Guys, I assure you that that is not me

I have been out for the last 6 hours so it wasnt me

My official standing however is a wait and see one after we had like 20 names left over from this method in RS

You know that this is me because in my update tonight which I’ll make in say 45 minutes will start with:

“Well, sorry about not having the guides today…not sure about the delay but I think they’ll come tonight so I will have them up by tomorrow if all goes well”

Got that?

By Meowth346 on Feb. 14th, 2005 at 12:46 AM

Thanks for posting that, Serebii. The other person posting under the name Serebii lives in the UK, so I wasn’t sure, but still had reason to suspect that it wasn’t you posting.

By Serebii on Feb. 14th, 2005 at 12:56 AM

No probs, you also know I’ld never be flat out rude like that

Plus I never use > _> :p

By Serebii on Feb. 14th, 2005 at 5:14 AM

Yes you do :P

By Water Pokémon Master on Feb. 14th, 2005 at 5:46 AM

Is “Anonymous” Serebii though? The guy used the same terms Serebii used at his forums, such as “bear fruit” and the specific name examples. :) Sorry I just had to point that out.

I can’t stand people who constantly shoot everything down and call it fake information. I have even seen some websites and specific forum webmasters say that this site is totally unreliable and that because of a few names being wrong in the past, this site is not a good source at all. If you people do not want to believe it, then don’t, but don’t go running around and bashing this site.

Anyways, I hope there is a Sudowoodo baby Pokemon. I can imagine a little branch guy running around. :D

By Serebii on Feb. 14th, 2005 at 6:06 AM

Shut up and leave us alone “The-Serebii-with-no-hyperlink”

By Meowth346 on Feb. 14th, 2005 at 7:11 AM

If I have to, I’ll start pruning comments out. Please remain civil, all.

By Himawari on Feb. 14th, 2005 at 10:39 AM

Meowth, what you say; hachi (in Usohachi) can mean either chopsticks or bridge. Could hachi mean also stick (-> chopsticks)?

Baby Sudowoodo would be sooo cute. I wish next month and next KoroKoro comes soon <3

By Serebii on Feb. 14th, 2005 at 11:14 AM

Chris, the last 2 Serebii comment were not me

Is there a way you can stop this guy?

By Animelee on Feb. 14th, 2005 at 11:21 AM

Heh, that would be pretty cute. For those who don’t know, Usoki (or those who prefer Usokki) – pretty much means “fake, false, pseudo, lie” and “wood” (Sudowoodo, heh, it’s a translation).

I hope I don’t seem rude, but “hashi” actually means “chopsticks or bridge”. ^^;;;

“Hachi” means “flowerpot or bowl”, which means Usohachi could be a fake tree sprout in a flowerpot, heh.

By Jass on Feb. 14th, 2005 at 11:45 AM

Could it be… Sudoticks (Psudo + Sticks)

By Himawari on Feb. 14th, 2005 at 1:28 PM

Oops.

What a mistake. Of course hashi is chopsticks/bridge, not hachi…

So Usohachi is maybe a cherrytree evolve of Usokki? ;D

By Garion on Feb. 15th, 2005 at 8:07 AM

this sounds good you go meowth!

I am A very and i mean very big sudowoodo fan and I can asure you a pre evolving from sudowoodo is much more needed than an evoling it would be so cute too!

PS: seribi i’m on your website and I know you don’t speak that way.

you anonymous serribi go away. and stay away! :P

By Emperor ServingSpoon on Feb. 15th, 2005 at 10:32 AM

Actually, a Sudowoodo baby would make sense, since there’s Munchlax, and Sudowoodo is the Johto Pokemon that serves the same role as Snorlax in GSC(obviously, it’s earlier, and I’m ignoring the Snorlax from in Kanto)… So it’d be a similar sort of thing. Only problem is that Sudowoodo is already fairly small.

By milktray on Feb. 15th, 2005 at 11:57 PM

Anonymous is/was also Serebii - the real one

His comments use the same language and grammar as he does in his comment on Serebiiforums about these “Pokemon”.

He also seems to jump at every chance to discredit u Meowth346 with frequent reminders about the Pokemon names u listed in anticipation of this gen.

One thing’s for sure…

Meowth346 had this news first ;)

Thanks Meowth346 for having the best source of Pokemon information and references.

By Serebii on Feb. 16th, 2005 at 12:10 AM

And when exactly did I try to discredit Meowth, I was just saying that past experience should make us a bit weary before we actually pass them off as Pokemon

And to be honest milktray, its a bit of Pokemon news, I dont care who had it first…if its out its out, I dont care…I have a life, a job and a site to run…i really dont care who has it first. I did not once actually discredit Meowth, just suggested that we should proceed with caution before saying they’re Pokémon

By Meowth346 on Feb. 16th, 2005 at 3:04 AM

milktray: I have access to the IP address of all posters. If someone posts under differnet names, I can tell.

By milktray on Feb. 16th, 2005 at 3:54 AM

I apologize. Because of the similarities in posts I jumped to conclusions. But still…

You seemed to be awful eager about handing out a list of all the ‘false’ names Meowth had given out in the past.

By Afriscot on Feb. 16th, 2005 at 6:07 AM

It’s too bad that Usohachi wasn’t Usohashi instead–that could’ve made it a stick bug/walking stick Pokemon (Bug/Grass), since according to previous posts, usoki means “fake” and hashi means “stick”.

As much as I like Sudowoodo (he’s my favourite Rock type), the idea of it having an evolved/preevolved form just doesn’t seem right to me.

I would’ve much preferred a Bug/Grass type stick bug over another Rock type petrified tree. :p

By Zhen Lin on Feb. 16th, 2005 at 9:41 AM

hashi means:

  1. end (i.e. of street); edge; tip; margin; point

  2. bridge

  3. chopsticks

hachi means:

  1. eight

  2. bowl; pot; basin; flowerpot; crow; brainpan

  3. bee

(among a few other things)

uso means: lie; falsehood; incorrect fact; inappropriate

usoppachi (very similar in kana to usohachi) means: downright lie

usotsuki (very similar in kana to usokki) means: liar; fibber

By Himawari on Feb. 16th, 2005 at 10:11 AM

Actually usohachi and usoppachi are same word. Japanese language have this “easier to say” feature with some words.

Example “nihon” and “nippon” (both mean “Japan” in japanese). Nippon is like old-fashioned form and Nihon is present-day one. Nowadays japanese ppl prefer to use word “nihon” when they are talking about their own country and nationality.

My english skill is not very good. What “downright” means in “downright lie”?

By Serebii on Feb. 16th, 2005 at 11:04 AM

Its not being eager, its called being cautious

By Big Al on Feb. 16th, 2005 at 2:42 PM

Himawari;

Downright in this usage means: thoroughgoing; unequivocal.

Take Care

By madds on Feb. 21st, 2005 at 10:21 AM

maybe you could calla pokemon

Grasshooper

longweed

aND

LIL’BITTA

By Animelee on Feb. 21st, 2005 at 10:04 PM

Sorry for posting off-topic, but if anyone’s planning to click Raion’s URL: DON’T. Once again, sorry for going off-topic, but I’m just posting this incase anyone’s browsing with kids beside them.

By milktray on Feb. 22nd, 2005 at 4:05 AM

OFF-TOPIC: You beat me to it Animelee.

I followed the link the other night but haven’t had the chance to come online again before now. I’m sure there’s kids browsing this site and so the warning’s a great idea.

am I the ONLY one hoping that these Pokemon - if official - don’t turn out to be related to ANY of the past?

By Afriscot on Feb. 22nd, 2005 at 7:45 AM

I agree.

The most I’d like to see is maybe two or three pre-evos (Munchlax, and then pre-evos for Mr. Mime and Kangaskhan).

The rest of the Pokemon should be totally new.

By Meowth346 on Feb. 22nd, 2005 at 6:06 PM

I’m so sorry about Raion’s URL, everyone. This is my chance to test banning people.